Popularity
3.6
Declining
Activity
0.0
-
381
4
25

Monthly Downloads: 0
Programming language: JavaScript
License: MIT License
Latest version: v1.7.0

Charge alternatives and similar modules

Based on the "Static Site Generators" category.
Alternatively, view Charge alternatives based on common mentions on social networks and blogs.

  • docsify

    🃏 A magical documentation site generator.
  • Metalsmith

    An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.
  • The Syncfusion JavaScript suite offers more than 65 cross-platform, responsive, and lightweight JS/HTML5 UI controls for building modern web applications.
  • Assemble

    Get the rocks out of your socks! Assemble makes you fast at web development! Used by thousands of projects for rapid prototyping, themes, scaffolds, boilerplates, e-books, UI components, API documentation, blogs, building websites/static site generator, an alternative to Jekyll for gh-pages and more! Gulp- and grunt-friendly.
  • Wintersmith

    A flexible static site generator
  • Phenomic

    Modern static website generator based on the React and Webpack ecosystem.
  • DocPad

    Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft powerful static sites quicker than ever before.
  • gray-matter

    Smarter YAML front matter parser, used by metalsmith, Gatsby, Netlify, Assemble, mapbox-gl, phenomic, and many others. Simple to use, and battle tested. Parses YAML by default but can also parse JSON Front Matter, Coffee Front Matter, TOML Front Matter, and has support for custom parsers.
  • front-matter

    Extract YAML front matter from strings

Do you think we are missing an alternative of Charge or a related project?

Add another 'Static Site Generators' Module

README

Charge

What?

Charge is an opinionated, zero-config static site generator written in JavaScript. It supports a wide variety of common uses and it does it without needing to be configured or customized. It’s fast, it’s simple, and it works the way you probably expect it to. That’s it.

Why?

Yeah, I know, another static site generator. Let me be clear, I really did not want to make a static site generator. It’s really the very last thing I wanted to do.

I went on StaticGen and looked at every JavaScript-based one. I could not find a single one that I thought was simple, well-documented, had the features I needed, was actively maintained, and was designed and worked the way I wanted. So here I am, making a static site generator.

Highlights

  • Zero configuration
  • Templating via JSX and MDX
  • React renders server-side, not client-side
  • Write futuristic JavaScript with Babel
  • Write futuristic CSS with PostCSS
  • Live-reloading development server
  • Rebuilds the minimum files necessary
  • Dynamic pages (coming soon)
  • Stellar documentation ✨

Documentation

You can find the Charge documentation on the website.

How is Charge different from GatsbyJS?

Gatsby is really cool, but it’s very different than Charge, with two particularly large differences.

Gatsby is configuration over convention. It can be used to build complex web applications, but because of that it can be very difficult to understand how to use it. You’ll need to know how to use Webpack, which personally gives me nightmares. It’s likely that you’ll need to spend time learning other tools and then configuring and tweaking Gatsby before you can use it for your site. Charge is convention over configuration. In fact, it has no configuration, it “just works”.

Gatsby renders pages client-side. That means it serves React and some related libraries to the browser along with your components in order to render the pages. Routing also happens client-side. Gatsby can render the initial page load server-side, but there’s no way to not serve hundreds of kilobytes of JavaScript to the browser. Charge uses React to render everything server-side. It generates a truly static site.

More practically, Gatsby is great if you’re building a large, complex website and want lots of control over how you build it. Charge is probably better if you’re building a small website and don’t want to waste time fiddling with configurations and cobbling different tools together.

Real examples

If you’d like to see everything in practice, check out these sites using Charge.

Contributing

Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/brandonweiss/charge.

License

The package is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.


*Note that all licence references and agreements mentioned in the Charge README section above are relevant to that project's source code only.